I was busy trying to increase real estate sales this morning and so missed the NAR’s paid liar economist Yun’s speech at the Milbrook Club this morning. Greenwich Time sent along a young reporter who, not surprisingly, heard nothing and asked nothing that would disturb the paper’s real estate advertisers. Everybody!: Everything is beautiful …
Daily Archives: June 29, 2011
Oh dear, my bad
Filed under Uncategorized
Is this right?
A reader says that Greenwich is cutting back to once-a-week garbage pickup. Really? My Ma and I have that arrangement with our carter but that’s because we’re just too old to generate much garbage. Were my kids still here, no way.
Filed under Uncategorized
Any suggestions?
Here’s a question from a reader (and by the way, I am always happy to post these things anonymously, as you see)
Off topic, please don’t post directly.
Can you ask your readers for a legitimate pool contractor for a renovation of a pool/patio in Greenwich? I have one quote and feel like I am getting completely fleeced for my zip code. Need some more quotes from legit vendors.
Filed under Uncategorized
Breaking news from 1965
Turtles on runway cause flight delays at JFK
UPDATE: a reader sends along this audio link (from the WSJ) to the actual turtle incident. Unless you were one of the passengers delayed for two hours, I think you’ll be charmed by these otherwise professional people going out of their way to avoid hurting momma turtles.
Filed under Uncategorized
Dang!
I knew I had something scheduled for this morning: the appearance of NAR’s economist at the Milbrook Club. I was off showing a house and completely forgot it. Was anyone there who took notes?
Filed under Uncategorized
Not saying it can’t happen
30 Park Avenue, Old Greenwich, new construction, has just been listed at $3 million. I have not seen this house and obviously can’t hazard an opinion on value, but it will certainly arch some eyebrows if it gets its price, and raise the value of older, more modest homes on Park considerably.
As an aside, I was recently asked by a friend for a price opinion on an out-of-town house owned by an estate. I know the town, have a pretty good grasp of what values are there, and gave my advice. In no way was I looking for the listing and I’m glad I wasn’t because I see it’s on today for $300,000 more than I thought it might fetch. That’s gonna be a contentious relationship.
Filed under Uncategorized
Another dream reduced
92 Mallard Drive just sold for $1.4 million. Asked $2.050 in 2007. Eventually, people get real.
Comments Off
Filed under Uncategorized
Well, he got the last laugh on me!
When, in 2007, I was asked to supply a price opinion for 18 Ferncliff Road, I suggested $1.395 million, based in part on the stated desire of the retired owners to quit Greenwich and settle permanently in their Hawaiian condominium as quickly as possible. The listing agent laughed at me and priced it at $1.995 and then, after persuading his clients to invest $100,000 in a new kitchen, raised the price to $2.195. It sold today, after 1,249 days on market, for $1.550. Showed me up, he did.
Filed under Uncategorized
Why our efforts in Afghanistan are doomed
Even our own government acknowledges that Muslims hate us and will not war on their brothers. So we’re supposed to raise a native army that will reject their religious belief? Never, ever. It was long time we went home.
Filed under Uncategorized
Kids’ll do the darndest things!
Filed under Uncategorized
All we are saying is give war a chance
Filed under Uncategorized
Is the market this dead?
As of 11:30, literally nothing has been reported on the GMLS today. I don’t know whether their system is down or there is nothing to report, but it makes real estate blogging difficult.
Comments Off
Filed under Uncategorized
Is email dead?
Maybe dying – that conference I attended in Newport last week caught my attention and I’ve been looking at how I communicate with clients these days – turns out, it’s mostly texting and were I more up-to-date, I’d be tweeting. Lengthy messages are still via email but, looking at my in box, I’d guess 90% of it is stuff I’m not interested in. Time to adjust, again.
Filed under Uncategorized
Bad news for Walter Noel and his suckers
Judge rules that clients of feeder funds aren’t entitled to repayment from Madoff recovery. Some direct Madoff investors are on target to get at least 75% of their money back but people who entrusted their money to Noel’s Fairfield Greenwich Group will get bupkis. Unfortunately for them, Walt’s Round Hill home is worth, at best, maybe $3 million – that’s not going to do it, so look for continued pressure on the girls to also give up their illicit gains (if there’s anything left – the ladies are doing their best to spend it as fast as they can).
Filed under Uncategorized
Riverside market continues to do well
New construction by a close friend of mine (but not my listing) has a very substantial contract. Details will follow when I can disclose them but suffice to say, were I in the spec business, and I wish I were, these days I’d build in Riverside. Biggest problem? Lack of “large” (0.6 +) lots.
Filed under Uncategorized
