What are they so afraid of?

It's the truth! Run away!

Warming Alarmists seek to purge TV weathermen who deny global warming. Except for Al Gore and our own Dollar Bill, no one thinks that short-term weather, which is what is discussed on local weather shows, has anything to do with long – term climate change. But in the brave new world, purity is everything.

The Forecast the Facts campaign — led by 350.org, the League of Conservation Voters and the Citizen Engagement Lab — is pushing for more of a focus on global warming in weather forecasts, and is highlighting the many meteorologists who do not share their beliefs.

“Our goal is nothing short of changing how the entire profession of meteorology tackles the issue of climate change,” the group explains on their website. “We’ll empower everyday people to make sure meteorologists understand that their viewers are counting on them to get this story right, and that those who continue to shirk their professional responsibility will be held accountable.”

These are the same people, or their spawn, who used to hiss and shout me down in college classrooms when I challenged our  professors’ communist prattle. They were terrified then and still are.

5 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

5 responses to “What are they so afraid of?

  1. FlyAngler

    Chris – How can you post on this topic and not find your way to mentioning that the organization Forecast the Facts is backed by the evil George Soros?! All manner of stories on this relationship can be found here:

    http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2003-35,GGLD:en&q=Forecast+the+Facts+soros

    And then there is this group of 16 scientists who write to the WSJ saying there is little to fear from “global warming”:

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204301404577171531838421366.html

  2. AJ

    I don’t know that they’re particularly afraid of anything, more like they’re just minions; minions of the Globalist, Agenda 21 Doctrine. W put it forward quite clearly, “Either your with us or against us”; be on message, or shut your mouth, and get out of here. This was to rob the planet, yet again, this time with carbon credits, and on a dreamed-of scale never before seen.

  3. FlyAngler

    In case your readers can not access the WSJ site (subscription), this is the key text that addresses your question as to what they fear – the loss of funding, funds, priviledge and prestige. It is funny but the most staunch defenders of AGW/ACC always blast the bid money interests (i.e. utilities, oil companies, coal industry, industrials) for acting with a financial motive and that it is all about the money. Yet, for many of the academic and political defenders (the Al Gores of the world), they too are in it for the money.

    From the WSJ article:

    “Why is there so much passion about global warming, and why has the issue become so vexing that the American Physical Society, from which Dr. Giaever resigned a few months ago, refused the seemingly reasonable request by many of its members to remove the word “incontrovertible” from its description of a scientific issue? There are several reasons, but a good place to start is the old question “cui bono?” Or the modern update, “Follow the money.”

    Alarmism over climate is of great benefit to many, providing government funding for academic research and a reason for government bureaucracies to grow. Alarmism also offers an excuse for governments to raise taxes, taxpayer-funded subsidies for businesses that understand how to work the political system, and a lure for big donations to charitable foundations promising to save the planet. Lysenko and his team lived very well, and they fiercely defended their dogma and the privileges it brought them.”

  4. anon

    When the PDO & the ADO kick into full stride “look out” it’s gonna get cold.

  5. Anonymous

    That’s pretty frightening. Ugh.