Walter Olson (Cato Institute, Overlawyered.com) has an article on Daily Caller today outlining the California trial lawyers’ latest money grab, mandatory labeling for all genetically engineered foods, with the burden on the retailer to prove that they aren’t.
Retailers (such as grocery stores) would be primarily responsible for complying with the measure by ensuring that their food products are correctly labeled. … For each product that is not labeled as GE, a retailer generally must be able to document why that product is exempt from labeling. [emphasis added] There are two main ways in which a retailer could document that a product is exempt: 1) by obtaining a sworn statement from the provider of the product (such as a wholesaler) indicating that the product has not been intentionally or knowingly genetically engineered or (2) by receiving independent certification that the product does not include GE ingredients. Other entities throughout the food supply chain (such as farmers and food manufacturers) may also be responsible for maintaining these records.
It’s funny (ha ha): for all the hysteria about GE food, which has proven to be harmless, whack-job shoppers at Trader Joe’s and Whole Foods don’t seem the least upset about those stores’ refusal to label their products’ country of origin. I’m far more concerned about eating something (especially fish) grown in China than I am about Frankenfood. Chinese farmers have been caught repeatedly dosing their goods with nearly every poison known to man, while a genetically modified tomato’s never hurt anyone. Why no outrage among the greenies? Apparently because shopping at Whole Foods with an organic hemp reusable bag makes you bullet proof. Seems dumb to me but then, I don’t drive a Prius.









