If you think this will make the eco-nuts finally shut up, you don’t know your ass from your Prius

Useful idiots march in Copenhagen

AP: CO2 emissions drop to their lowest level in 20 years.

In a surprising turnaround, the amount of carbon dioxide being released into the atmosphere in the U.S. has fallen dramatically to its lowest level in 20 years, and government officials say the biggest reason is that cheap and plentiful natural gas has led many power plant operators to switch from dirtier-burning coal.

Many of the world’s leading climate scientists didn’t see the drop coming, in large part because it happened as a result of market forces rather than direct government action against carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas that traps heat in the atmosphere.

In a little-noticed technical report [The blog, "Whatsupwiththat" noticed and wrote about all this July 2, but he's just a blogger and thus doesn't count- ED] , the U.S. Energy Information Agency, a part of the Energy Department, said this month that energy related U.S. CO2 emissions for the first four months of this year fell to about 1992 levels. Energy emissions make up about 98 percent of the total. The Associated Press contacted environmental experts, scientists and utility companies and learned that virtually everyone believes the shift could have major long-term implications for U.S. energy policy.

While conservation efforts, the lagging economy and greater use of renewable energy are factors in the CO2 decline, the drop-off is due mainly to low-priced natural gas, the agency said.

A frenzy of shale gas drilling in the Northeast’s Marcellus Shale and in Texas, Arkansas and Louisiana has caused the wholesale price of natural gas to plummet from $7 or $8 per unit to about $3 over the past four years, making it cheaper to burn than coal for a given amount of energy produced. As a result, utilities are relying more than ever on gas-fired generating plants.

Market forces instead of government action – who could possibly have thought that might be a solution? I blame Cheney.

Read the entire article, if you must, for the knee-jerk, obligatory squawking from people who see their jobs going up in (clean) smoke. But here’s a sampling:

The question is whether the shift is just one bright spot in a big, gloomy picture, or a potentially larger trend.

Also, while natural gas burns cleaner than coal, it still emits some CO2. And drilling has its own environmental consequences, which are not yet fully understood.

“Natural gas is not a long-term solution to the CO2 problem,” Pielke warned.

And this:

“The Sierra Club has serious doubts about the net benefits of natural gas,” said Deborah Nardone, director of the group’s Beyond Natural Gas campaign.

“Without sufficient oversight and protections, we have no way of knowing how much dangerous pollution is being released into Americans’ air and water by the gas industry. For those reason, our ultimate goal is to replace coal with clean energy and energy efficiency and as little natural gas as possible.”

Gee, who could we possibly persuade to take on the onerous duty of providing “oversight and protection”?

5 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

5 responses to “If you think this will make the eco-nuts finally shut up, you don’t know your ass from your Prius

  1. Except of course, that the Greenies are really against all of that messy fracking stuff. They want to kill the natgas industry too.

  2. Anonymous

    Ok, ok. I’ll make that huge sacrifice AGAIN, but only if I get to fly AF1 whenever I want, unlimited golf outings, the chef makes me fresh truffle Risotto once a week and I never have to listen to that crashing bore Joe Biden again!

  3. Fred2

    “In a surprising turnaround, ” That’s like Instapundit’s “Unexpectedly” watch list right?

    I’m so waiting for the new administration where every new bit of bad news is a front page story and “unexpectedly” is banished and replaced with ” Sexist, misogynist, thuggish republicans miss-steps and gaffes have direct resulted it in”

  4. Anonymous

    Bad news for the tree huggers (this is not the Sierra Club I remember from my childhood), there’s a Canadian company that’s come up with a way to frack without using water. Cool beans.
    http://www.mysanantonio.com/business/article/Waterless-fracking-firm-to-hire-100-3620503.php

  5. pulled up in OG

    You obviously have no clue who Pielke is and where sits in the scheme of things. : )