Hollywood celebrities respond to Newtown, non-celebrities respond in kind.

9 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

9 responses to “Hollywood celebrities respond to Newtown, non-celebrities respond in kind.

  1. Walt

    Dude –
    So you have emerged from your cave? I thought you may have gone to the Bahamas with Nikki Minaj, she of the big black booty ass, which I so admire, and all of your other new found celebrity friends. I wondered if you had forgotten all of your “little people” friends now that you are a star?

    What is it like bumping ass with Lady Gaga? Giving a bronskie to Katy Perry? Bumping and grinding with Carly Rae Jepson? Showing Mr. Happy Puppet to Beyonce? I wonder about these things a lot.

    Anyhows, I see the GAR has a new website. It says it is a “professional tool” for all of its members. I thought you were all “professional tools”. When you look up the definition of “professional realtor” it says “professional tool”. So why does a tool need more tools? You tool.

    And it seems to me that they are pissing away your membership dues. There are no pictures. I visited the site to try and see what the GAR Evil Princess looked like. I was hoping for an up skirt photo, but would have settled for a headshot. Instead I got squat.

    So what is the purpose of the website?

    And seriously, Happy New Year to you, your family, and the reader. I really mean that.

    You loser.
    Your Pal,
    Walt

  2. LAK

    Oh yeah…nevermind the pictures you post. Where did you find Walt??? LOL!!!
    Walt should have a blog. I’d follow him. I think? LOL

  3. Chimney

    Speaking of Newtown, did you see the headlines in the Newtown Time, formerly known as the Greenwich Time today- Newtown has been on the front page every day since it happened. It’s getting to be worse than the New York tabloids. What a poor excuse for a “local” paper. Sorry Bernie.

    • AJ

      ‘Sandy Hook: more television brainwashing using guests as fodder’

      “…Under no circumstances, of course, will the producer or the anchor permit the mother to go on camera and show outrage and anger. That’s verboten. That cuts too close to the bone. That doesn’t fit the mandatory sequence of horror, shock, loss, grief, healing, resolution, celebration of a life lost…”

      “…Completely wacko. But that’s what the television audience sees and digests and accepts. And the anchor moves it right along. A fabricated story…”

      “…This is how a handful of television interviews with skillfully prepped guests can make all the difference in the world. Especially, in the case of Sandy Hook, when gun ownership is now at stake. Do I have to draw a picture for you?…”

      http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2012/12/29/sandy-hook-how-television-takes-your-guns/

  4. AJ

    Dianne Feinstein: “I Carried a Concealed Weapon” — article with video.
    http://www.infowars.com/dianne-feinstein-i-carried-a-concealed-weapon/

  5. AJ

    ‘Facebook bans Gandhi quote as part of revisionist history purge’

    Apparently even Gandhi quotes are verboten as the NWO tries to control what you think, what you see and hear.
    http://www.naturalnews.com/038484_Gandhi_quote_Facebook_censorship.html

  6. This celeb video fails becuz they don’t demand less action gun violence in their movie roles. Ppl kill ppl not guns

  7. Bookish1

    What a bunch of smarmy, self-righteous dweebs. If they’re so anti-gun, let them prove it by refusing to make any more films that include gun violence. How many of them do you suppose rely on armed guards?