Daily Archives: February 2, 2013

Better

Nobel Peace Prize recipient and Whacky Paki  A-Rab hunter Barack Hussein practices marksmanship at Camp David:

Paki Hunter

12 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

And it begins

The first salvo.  Credit for being first, guy, but I expect better things by tomorrow.

A little warm up

A little warm up

Man in Black defends us from Tom Cruise

Man in Black defends us from Tom Cruise

And the ol' classic ....

And the ol’ classic ….

5 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Oxymorons

DIA Fashion ConsultantHelen Thomas speaks truth to the clueless

DIA Fashion ConsultantHelen Thomas speaks truth to the clueless

Defense Intelligence [sic] Agency provides fashion tips for it’s warriors: 

A week after women were cleared to serve in combat, Defense Intelligence Agency employees got a different message. “Makeup makes you more attractive.” “Don’t be a plain Jane.” “A sweater with a skirt is better than a sweater with slacks.” “No flats.” “Paint your nails.” “Don’t be afraid of color.” And, “brunettes have more leeway with vibrant colors than blondes or redheads.”

Men and women at DIA were given fashion advice in a presentation prepared by an employee at the agency this week.[emphasis added] 

The presentation offered gender-specific advice on how to improve one’s success in the workplace through appearance. “It was an informal event that an employee put together, a briefing on How to Dress for Success,” Strednansky says. “It’s not directive. It is not mandatory. It is just, ‘Hey, here are some suggestions.'”

No word on how many of the DIA’s 20,000 employees were paid to sit through that meeting nor how much was spent to prepare and present it, but at least it wasn’t held in Las Vegas – was it?

3 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

It’s still 1921 in the Fountain household!

colt ad 1921

2 Comments

February 2, 2013 · 2:24 pm

Country club Republican

(The other) Tom Foley swore he only shot bb guns and was shot down by the voters

(The other) Tom Foley swore he only shot bb guns and was shot down by the voters

Greenwich resident Tom Foley wants to be governor and desperately wants the approval of his fellow clubobian Jack Mo’ Fly, hip hop artist and founder of Greenwich Magazine, so he’s joined Jack in a call for feel-good gun laws that will give the appearance of doing something to respond to the Newtown massacre.

“I only own shotguns,” he insisted to the press, as though that would allow him to straddle both camps, and he continued in that vein, trying to have it both ways.

Foley stopped short of embracing an assault weapons ban, like the one sponsored by members of Connecticut’s congressional delegation at the federal level or one recently passed by New York state.

“I think the litmus test for any gun control legislation should be, would the action taken have prevented what happened at Sandy Hook?” Foley said. “It’s touchy. It’s very emotional because of what happened at Sandy Hook.”

The Assault Weapons Ban of 2013, which was introduced last week in Washington, would ban sales of the Bushmaster XM-15 E2S, the semi-automatic rifle used by Sandy Hook shooter Adam Lanza to kill 20 children age 7 and under, and six adults in the worst grade-school massacre in U.S. history.

The .223-caliber rifle meets some, but not all, of the specifications to be considered an illegal assault weapon in Connecticut under the state’s existing gun laws. It is capable of accepting detachable magazines of ammunition and has a pistol grip, both of which the state says are characteristic of assault weapons.

“I think if the manufacturer, if their intent was to produce an assault weapon to get under the laws, then it should be disallowed,” Foley said. “Then this should be illegal.”

On the push to limit the number of rounds of ammunition held in gun magazines, Foley said that if the investigation into the Newtown tragedy shows that high-capacity clips played a role in the murders, he could accept that.

“If it turns out that something with respect to high-capacity magazines would have prevented what happened at Sandy Hook, I think that’s an appropriate thing for the Legislature to consider changing,” Foley said.

Foley’s abandonment of a politically powerful constituency is as shortsighted as Obummer’s posing with a gun: it’s trading off something for nothing. Connecticut Democrats will not switch their vote to a Republican in this state merely because he’s against 10-capacity magazines and pistol grips on rifles, and those small government types who were drawn to him by his fiscal policies will almost certainly sit out the election  at best, and perhaps even actively recruit a more attractive candidate.

12 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

If it’s from the main stream press it must be true

AP caught doctoring news report, substitutes “assault rifle” for “shotgun”.  Now that their leader has revealed himself to be a shotgun lover, I suppose they had to scramble to find a weapon he really didn’t like.

Bob Owens nails ‘em:

Here’s the current Associated Press report:

Dykes was known in the neighborhood as a menacing figure who neighbors said once beat a dog to death with a lead pipe, threatened to shoot children for setting foot on his property and patrolled his yard at night with a flashlight and an assault rifle.

Here’s the earlier story:

Dykes was known around the neighborhood as a menacing figure who once beat a dog to death with a lead pipe, threatened to shoot children for setting foot on his property and patrolled his yard at night with a flashlight and a shotgun.

 Yes, the Associated Press has been caught red-handed changing “shotgun” to “assault rifle” in their reporting.Since the beginning of the standoff (example) it has been reported only that Dykes has been armed with a shotgun when patrolling his property. The morphing of the shotgun into an assault rifle seems to have happened within the past four hours.

Update: Without noting that they’ve made a correction of any kind, the story haschanged again:

Dykes was known around the neighborhood as a menacing figure who neighbors said once beat a dog to death with a lead pipe, threatened to shoot children for setting foot on his property and patrolled his yard at night with a flashlight and a firearm.

It’s just too bad for them that screen caps never die.

4 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

White House to bloggers: Don’t you DARE Photoshop our Photoshop!

(Thanks, EOS). Stung by the laughter from the non mainstream press at the Kenyan’s claim to be an avid skeet shooter, the White House has ginned up a picture purporting to show the Golfer in Chief firing at his bodyguards. So far so normal, but the lackeys released their effort to the press accompanied by this warning:

Have (borrowed) gun, will pose

Have (borrowed) gun, will pose

“This official White House photograph is being made available only for publication by news organizations and/or for personal use printing by the subject(s) of the photograph. The photograph may not be manipulated in any way and may not be used in commercial or political materials, advertisements, emails, products, promotions that in any way suggests approval or endorsement of the President, the First Family, or the White House.”

I don’t own a PhotoShop program yet – a situation I’ve been meaning to remedy, but I guarantee you that there are many bloggers out there ready to respond to the White House’s dare, and I’ll post the results as they become available.

(Do check out the position of the gun stock as painted in by his handlers. They could at least tuck it away low into the shoulder where it belongs. And what’s with the steam kettle thing going on around the barrel – two little clouds of smoke? One from the side-mounted muzzle, perhaps? Now that’s an assault weapon!)

UPDATE: AJ notices something else: “What’s interesting about that photo is that the gun is pointed up and his line of vision (the tilt of the head) is pointed down, almost as if he closed his eyes when he pulled the trigger.”

UPDATE II: A reader informs me that the side vent is from a muzzle break which, unlike a flash suppresser is, as of now, still legal. But here’s another question: why is the normally politically astute White House bothering with this unless the backlash against his gun demonization campaign is growing out of control? Certainly his own supporters will give him no points for pretending to love guns, and gun owners know exactly who he is and won’t join his game of pretend even if he poses with an Abrams tank, so what’s the point? Gotta be that he’s hearing from Democrats in the hinterlands (Al Franken, anyone?) who are getting clobbered by their constituents.

27 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Al Gore: we must extinguish the sun by 2020 or we’re doomed; doooomed!

The world according to Al

The world according to Al

UN Study admits that the sun may play ” a significant role”  in global warming. The science is settled, and always has been, but it was settled by the handful of brave scientists who stood up to their peers and pointed this out years ago.

A leaked report by a United Nations’ group dedicated to climate studies says that heat from the sun may play a larger role than previously thought.

“[Results] do suggest the possibility of a much larger impact of solar variations on the stratosphere than previously thought, and some studies have suggested that this may lead to significant regional impacts on climate,” reads a draft copy of a major, upcoming report from the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

As usual, the warmists are scrambling to defend their beloved computer models (the most famous of which being the Al Gore “hockey stick” that proved, until it was exposed as a fraud, that the earth’s climate was being pushed to the breaking point by human activity).

“The solar component is real but not of sufficient magnitude to have driven most [emphasis added] of the warming of the late 20th century,” Pat Michaels, the former president of the American Association of State Climatologists, and current director of the Center for the Study of Science at the Cato Institute, told FoxNews.com.

The U.N. report also says that the effect of solar activity will be “much smaller than the warming expected from increases in [man-made] greenhouse gases.”

An estimate from NASA said that solar variations caused 25 percent of the 1.1 degree Fahrenheit warming that has been observed over the past century.

What if they came out with a theory that said it was scientifically proven that the earth was warming to catastrophic levels entirely because of human – produced “green house gasses”, that temperatures would climb uninterrupted and inexorably unless the entire world shut down all carbon fuel sources within 15 years? What if it were then leaked by one of the most ardent supporters of the theory’s calculation that those “settled science” models failed to account for 25% of that rise, which was in fact caused by the sun, a force that so far, even Barrack Obama has claimed no control over? Would that make you rethink the models? The models which claim to be so accurate that they can predict to a tenth of a degree what the temperature will be on February 28, 2079? Would it make you question whether it is really possible to prevent a warmer climate? Or wonder whether it might make more sense to start planning for that warmer future rather than engage in a ruinously expensive, futile effort to (literally) hold back the tide?

Not the warmists, who will not budge, just as they’ve ignored the revelation that the earth stopped getting warmer 17 years ago, and refuse to acknowledge that China and India, already the world’s largest producers of greenhouse gasses, are on track to completely replace the First World’s emissions by new growth of their own, thereby rendering moot our efforts here (Europe, North America) even if we shut down our entire economies.

I’ll say it again – and again and again: “Global Warming”, as preached by western religionist, is all about the power to control (other) human’s lives and has nothing to do with saving the world. Nothing.

9 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized