Greenwich Time headline says it all “Could have been worse”

After hyping it up for days, media’s beginning to lose interest in The Great Fizzle of ’13

Screen Shot 2013-02-08 at 11.38.27 AM

11 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

11 responses to “Greenwich Time headline says it all “Could have been worse”

  1. Al Dente

    The storm is a big flopola and the guv declares an emergency? That’s probably so thousands of state employees qualify for the only thing better than my linguine with clam sauce: AUTOMATIC OVERTIME.

  2. David Smith

    Off subject.

    Is FWIW missing the LAPD machine gunning two women because the police “thought” the truck they were driving was the same type as that being used by Dorner?

  3. Demmerkrat Patriot

    http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_2445.html

    Today is a warm up …. tonight might be a bit nastier.

  4. anonymous

    Off topic, but news is quiet on this. What is your/readers take? Feds expanding powers over state/local building code? Opportunity to give more contracts to cronies? Hire more fed employees for oversight and enforcement? All of the above?

    http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/healthy_homes/advhh

  5. The New Normal

    didn’t know the storm was over – looks to me like it’s still coming down at a good clip

  6. sNOw OK

    http://www.goes.noaa.gov/ECIR4.html

    Maybe this picture will help you realize the storm.

  7. Walt

    Dude –
    What is going on? Did I do something wrong? Did I offend you?

    I thought you believed in freedom of expression? But without the freedom to offend, it ceases to exist. Freedom of speech includes the freedom to offend. But who did I offend? You? HOW?? I am more clueless than usual.

    I meant no offense to no one. To anyone. To all. God Bless us all. EVERYONE!! Tiny Tim Dude!! The kid in the Scrooge movie, not the Johnny Carson one. Who is dead, BTW. Actually I think both the Tinys are dead. So sad.

    Anyhows, you can only really offend someone if you mean something to them, so think about that.

    So what rules have I broken? What line have I crossed? If I knew you reacted to FMP’s the way the 3 Stooges reacted to “Niagara Falls”, I would have never brought them up. “Slowly I turned…Step by Step”!!

    I guess I should have figured that out. The similarities between you and Moe really are uncanny!! Except Moe was a Jew, and you aren’t, right?

    But I really had no clue about your visceral reaction to shoes. I would have never brought them up. You know that. BTW, how do you feel about gloves? Or hats? Socks are probably dicey, correct?

    So did I break any rules on this post? Are you going to trash this one as well? Can I talk about sneakers and flip flops, or is all footwear off limits? Have I been banished from posting because of footwear?? The Horror!!

    Help me out with this, will ya? You want to go to Tom McCann’s before the snow really hits?

    You loser.
    Your Pal,
    Walt

  8. David Smith

    The LAPD mistake shooting.

    The MSM is really downplaying this. Lots of hits on google, but most of them repeats and contradictory (shot once or twice, minor or critical, etc.).

    The police have seemingly released only one photo of the women’s truck. Only from the rear and showing about thirty bullet holes. I’d like to see the sides and front of the truck also. Is it thirty bullet holes or three hundred? Only in the back or also in the front and sides (one story said the police shot as the truck came towards them – YOU figure it out).