Daily Archives: February 26, 2013
Leery of the governor’s plans to raid special programs, … Democratic lawmakers are proposing increases in income, estate, corporation, sales and cigarette taxes.
Rich vs. poor
“We will, I think, need some additional revenues to have a balanced budget, and I’ve always believed we should have more progressivity in our income tax,” said Senate Majority Leader Martin M. Looney, D-New Haven.
Looney has proposed boosting the income tax’s top marginal rate from 6.7 to 6.9 percent. That would apply to earnings above $250,000 for individuals and above $500,000 for couples.
Seeking more from big corporations
With fiscal analysts projecting a 6 percent gap, about $1.2 billion, in next year’s finances based on current trends, Malloy was hard pressed to avoid tax hikes, and is seeking more from businesses.
But Malloy argues the $139 million extra from the corporation, electricity generation and insurance premiums taxes comes only from extending existing rates or credit limits otherwise set to expire — and therefore doesn’t count as a tax hike.
“I think he had to look at every option to deal with a difficult situation,” said Flexer. “But now it is our responsibility to do the same.”
Flexer is one of several lawmakers who has proposed a “combined reporting” measure to ensure that Connecticut corporations pay more in taxes.
The “combined reporting” concept holds that any corporate group with at least one affiliate here should owe taxes that reflect the entire group’s net income.
Rep. Betsy Ritter, a Waterford Democrat, not only has sponsored a “combined reporting” bill, but she has also proposed a hoarder’s tax. This would place a levy on liquid assets — companies with a lot of money in the bank — and dedicate the proceeds to job creation programs.
While Malloy has said repeatedly this is not the time to raise taxes, that line already has been crossed, Ritter said.
“It sounds to me like the legislature is respectfully saying (tax increases) are something we have to have on the table to have a balanced discussion about the budget,” she said.
Other proposals offered recently would repeal a 2009 tax cut on wealthy estates, increase sales tax on food served at restaurants, add 95 cents per pack to the cigarette tax and preserve the towns’ share of state sales and real estate conveyance taxes — worth just under $100 million per year.
The finance committee did raise a concept bill — a measure with a title, but no specific language drafted to date — regarding the real estate conveyance tax. Such measures typically are drafted in anticipation that members may discuss the topic during the legislative session.
Rep. Sean Williams of Watertown, ranking GOP representative on the finance committee, said he doesn’t think Democrats will find the spending cuts needed to support tax hikes and said he fears it will be hard enough to eliminate the other revenue gimmicks in the budget. “There is never enough money for these folks to spend.”
The Mickster, as optimistic as only an Irish Guinness salesman can be, writes in to comment on the amazing housing recovery here in town and “New Normal” who is either another agent or a desperate Greenwich homeowner goes even farther than the Mickster in damp-panty enthusiasm:
“Chris Fountain himself will tell you this is probably the busiest Jan and Feb he has had in a while; call it anecdotal or fudging the numbers as much as you want, transactions are happening at a much more rapid pace than normal.”
Well okay, are we seeing the normal spring market or are we really observing a phenomenal recovery? Let’s go to the videotape, and compare January February contracts and accepted offers:
So what’s got Wall Street and FWIW’s reader “New Normal” so hetted up today? Reader Shoeless sends along this link to Zero Hedge so that you can see for yourself. )Note the number homes, nationwide, selling for more than $750,000: 1,000.)
In the government’s endless desire to show just how blistering, nay, stupendously amazingful the gargantuantest housing recovery has been, we just got news that New Home Sales in January soared, SOARED, to 437K from an upward revised 378K, slamming expectations of a 380K print (chart). “This is the best New Home Sales print since August 2008!” the mainstream media roared with adoration and approval (hoping for an avalanche of ad RFPs from Trulia, Zillow and of course, the NAR). Alas, as so often happens, there was more than meets the eye.
Much, much more.
For one: the actual, unadjusted number of homes sold in January was a meager 31K (of which 1,000 houses sold in the $750K+ range): a tiny 4K increase from December, the same as August, and lower than all months from March to July 2012 (chart); the houses for sale rose to the highest since December 2011; the Median Price plunged to $226,400, the lowest since January 2012 and down $23k from December’s $249,800. Finally of the 31K houses sold in January, just 12K were actually completed, with 10K under construction and 10K not even started. So who cares: seasonal adjustments happen all the time, and January just happens to be an important inflection point right? Yes.
Which is precisely why we took the December-to-January change in New Home Sales as reported since the peak of the housing bubble, to get an accurate sense of how this inversion has behaved in history. The result is plotted below: the blue bar shows the sequential change in actual data. The red one shows the seasonally adjusted one.
James Taranto looks at the revelation that Obama’s selling himself for $500,000 per trick, and isn’t impressed. In fact, even Obama must be disgusted with himself, although his followers are steadfast.
BuzzFeed’s Andrew Kaczynski unearths a clip of then-Sen. Obama in 2008 railing against ” ‘the cynics, and the lobbyists, and the special interests’ who ‘write the checks’ and ‘get the access while you’ “–the poor suckers in the audience–” ‘get to write a letter.’ ” Quoth candidate Obama: “They think they own this government, but we’re here today to take it back.” They’ve taken it back, all right, and they’re milking it for all it’s worth.