Rangel says he’s been exonerated. “My staff, they knew who was paying for my junket, but me? Me? Hell, I just stuffed the ticket in my pocket and went. What, you think I should have asked? Fuck you!” Nancy Pelosi continues to support the Chairman of the house Ways and Means Committee because “well heck, he’s a Negro – everyone knows they have no morals”.
Tag Archives: Charles Rangel
A TV journalist named Dylan Ratigan has a post fuming that Wall Street has grabbed hold of the levers of power in Washington and is manipulating them to squeeze us dry. I’m not a populist, but I’m also not in favor of huge industries using huge government to screw the country, so I’m with Ratigan on this one. In fact, it’s very much along the lines of the argument I posted earlier today on restoring the free market. Repeal “too big to fail” and let these clowns survive or die by their own efforts, not ours. While we’re at it, can we get Charlie Rangel to pay his taxes?
In an amazing display of brotherhood and good feelings, the Democrats are going to overlook House Ways and Means Chariman Charlie Rangel’s long history of tax fraud, tax evasion and general lawlessness that is being slowly exposed, so long as he doesn’t do it again. Nancy Pelosi, having “drained the swamp” and rid the capital of its “culture of corruption” now sees no further need for ethics. We got rid of Bush, now it’s back to the business of running this country.
The fat pig pictured here is the Chairman of the House Ways and Means Comittee and thus responsible for drafting our tax code. So when he calls for a higher tax rate, he’s got more clout than that idiot-kin Rep. Conyers and his own demand that whites pay slavery reperations. The Wall Street Journal has an editorial today outlining some of the graft and deceit of Rangeland just in case you missed it, I reproduce most of it here.
Ever notice that those who endorse high taxes and those who actually pay them aren’t the same people? Consider the curious case of Ways and Means Chairman Charlie Rangel, who is leading the charge for a new 5.4-percentage point income tax surcharge and recently called it “the moral thing to do.” About his own tax liability he seems less, well, fervent.
Exhibit A concerns a rental property Mr. Rangel purchased in 1987 at the Punta Cana Yacht Club in the Dominican Republic. The rental income from that property ought to be substantial since it is a luxury beach-front villa and is more often than not rented out. But when the National Legal and Policy Center looked at Mr. Rangel’s House financial disclosure forms in August, it noted that his reported income looked suspiciously low. In 2004 and 2005, he reported no more than $5,000, and in 2006 and 2007 no income at all from the property.
The Congressman initially denied there was any unreported income. But reporters quickly showed that the villa is among the most desirable at Punta Cana and that it rents for $500 a night in the low season, and as much as $1,100 a night in peak season. Last year it was fully booked between December 15 and April 15.
Mr. Rangel soon admitted having failed to report rental income of $75,000 over the years. First he blamed his wife for the oversight because he said she was supposed to be managing the property. Then he blamed the language barrier. “Every time I thought I was getting somewhere, they’d start speaking Spanish,” Mr. Rangel explained.
Mr. Rangel promised last fall to amend his tax returns, pay what is due and correct the information on his annual financial disclosure form. But the deadline for the 2008 filing was May 15 and as of last week he still had not filed. His press spokesman declined to answer questions about anything related to his ethics problems.
Besides not paying those pesky taxes, Mr. Rangel had other reasons for wanting to hide income. As the tenant of four rent-stabilized apartments in Harlem, the Congressman needed to keep his annual reported income below $175,000, lest he be ineligible as a hardship case for rent control. (He also used one of the apartments as an office in violation of rent-control rules, but that’s another story.)
Mr. Rangel said last fall that “I never had any idea that I got any income’’ from the villa. Try using that one the next time the IRS comes after you. Equally interesting is his claim that he didn’t know that the developer of the Dominican Republic villa had converted his $52,000 mortgage to an interest-free loan in 1990. That would seem to violate House rules on gifts, which say Members may only accept loans on “terms that are generally available to the public.” Try getting an interest-free loan from your banker.
The National Legal and Policy Center also says it has confirmed that Mr. Rangel owned a home in Washington from 1971-2000 and during that time claimed a “homestead” exemption that allowed him to save on his District of Columbia property taxes. However, the homestead exemption only applies to a principal residence, and the Washington home could not have qualified as such since Mr. Rangel’s rent-stabilized apartments in New York have the same requirement.
You probably are thinking, “this is no worse than what Chris Dodd’s been up to and no one’s picking on him” and you’ be right. But maybe Pelosi and Reid should begin to make good on their promise to “drain the swamp” and eliminate the “culture of corruption” and do something about both Rangel and the Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee this year. Will that happen? The odds are far greater that you’ll be enjoying a tax increase next year.
Traitor, scumbag and all around thieving piece of dirt John Murtha has used our money to fund a nephew of similar talents in a no-show job. Never one to hide his light under a bushel, the Congressman has showered the kid with millions of dollars. Why is there no ethics inquiry of this man? Because Congress changed the rules prohibiting private citizens’ complaints from triggering one. And who changed the rules? John Murtha and Charles Rangel. Our country is in the best of hands.