A school system already top heavy with administrators – let’s cut some

Greenwich school administrators reject wage, hour concessions.

RTM members said they were dismayed that the school administrators’ union had not struck a similar compromise with the Board of Education, and instead decided to pursue more generous terms than what was initially proposed.

“The feeling was that we were asking the (school) administrators to help us, and they were just like, ‘Forget it,'” Caldwell said. “People felt other unions were being treated inequitably.”

The teachers’ union has avoided major concessions on wages and benefits this fiscal year, despite pressure from the school board.

New Lebanon School Principal Gene Nyitray, a GOSA co-president, defended his union’s decision to pursue a contract that he believes reflects the high expectations and work load placed on school administrators.

“We’re sensitive to the economic situation, and we respect the work of our colleagues, but this is a managerial union with unique leadership responsibilities,” he said. “People entrust their children to us, and that’s an awesome responsibility.”

The administrators’ wage increase next fiscal year is expected to take a more than $100,000 chunk out of the district’s roughly $126 million budget in the 2010-11 year, according to board member Steve Anderson. He said it was too early to tell what areas of the education budget could be affected by that.

Between administrators’ salaries and benefits, he said, the new labor agreement is expected to cost the town, on average, nearly $8.5 million per year over the next three years. That marks an annual “cost of contract” of, on average, 1.09 percent over the current contract.

“The key is to understand how important it is for (state) arbitrators to realize that Greenwich cannot always lay golden eggs,” Anderson said. “Every town’s resources are finite.”

Under its 2007-10 contract, approved by the board following negotiations in 2007, administrators received a general wage increase of 3.5 percent in each of the three school years.

That contract also included a performance-pay component during the first two school years that was eliminated in the third in an effort by the school board to come up with additional savings in the 2009-10 education budget.

Under the current contract’s seniority-based salary structure, after three years, the high school headmaster makes more than $167,000; the high school’s five housemasters make nearly $136,000; middle school principals make about $152,000; and elementary principals make about $144,000.

Dump ’em.


Filed under Uncategorized

7 responses to “A school system already top heavy with administrators – let’s cut some

  1. Anonymous

    Damn unions, simply a form of organized crime for lazy, overpaid workers

  2. cutaway

    we should be starting with the pd time to move them along

  3. cutaway

    in fact i think we can get all we need from the pd and other non educator town employees

  4. Anonymous

    and all this for a crappy math curriculum and mediocre scores

  5. Oh poor teachers

    Really, 5 house ghs leaders making what the average doctor makes. do we even need them? save the 500K annnual and their pensions for LIFE with health benefits. don’t cry teachers, you ain’t poor. get rid of the pathetic bastards.

  6. Assistant Principals-the REAL joke

    The principal make 154K at Western. At Western they have TWO assistant principals just to make the principal’s life even easier. WHAT A JOKE. You Greenwich residents are more stupid than I thunk!

  7. pulled up in OG

    And you can’t find these mutts without a search company. Bad enough they couldn’t find a sup’t without surveys and forums, it’s the same crap again for GHS headmaster.

    “Residents can also fill out a two-page survey regarding the preferred characteristics of the top GHS administrator, and what they see as the high school’s biggest strengths and challenges, and suggest someone who’d make a good headmaster.

    Survey responses and input from the upcoming forum will be incorporated into a leadership profile crafted by Glenview, Ill.-based search firm Hazard, Young, Attea and Associates Ltd., to guide the company in its search for the next headmaster.

    “The position of headmaster or headmistress of Greenwich High School is one of the most important and prominent positions in the community,” responsible for ensuring that students are well prepared after they graduate, said district spokeswoman Kim Eves. “It is, therefore, critical to receive input from the community on the profile of the leader they would like to see in this position.”

    Hazard’s plan is to consult with school officials, the board and community members to determine a set of job requirements and search criteria before it begins recruiting and interviewing candidates.”