In just one week, February 24th, the BOE plans to meet and possibly decide whether to sign over our school system to the United Nations, giving that organization full control of what, and how our children are to be taught. This seems a little abrupt to me.
For instance, why aren’t the curriculum guidelines available online? For that matter, could we see the text books currently being used at Dundee School? And why aren’t they online? Where are the materials proposed to employed at our Middle Schools and the High School?
From what I gather, our superintendent has already diverted money to the re-education of teachers around town so that they will be ready to teach the new order. Hmm, kind of makes you think he’s already pushed his decision though on this matter, especially because he’s announced to have the IB system up and running by fall this year.
Do you think Dr. Freund has something to hide?
I understand that the initials stand for International baccalaureate, its curriculum is somehow dictated by Switzerland, it’s been successful at Dundee for ten years, but what the heck does any of that mean? I’m getting heat from some readers for not posting on it, now that our system intends to expand IB to all our schools, but I can’t comment on something I know nothing about (liberal readers of this blog would vehemently disagree with that last bit). I can’t find a description of the program at the School Board’s website, and I’m stumped. I’ll next try Google, but I’d prefer hearing from one of you who can steer to a description of the exact program our board seeks to install.
UPDATE: Okay Google yields this home site for the IB organization but the site supplies only the same mush-mouthed aspirations and goals that any other school, private or public uses; strive! excellence! tolerance of other cultures! Tells me nothing, which would seem to be the point.
UPDATE II: Good Lord. Wikipedia says the whole thing was founded in 1948 by some Swiss lady, a member of UNESCO, and was based on her book of that year, Is there a way we can teach peace? If that doesn’t set alarm bells ringing in your noggin then you probably subscribe to The New York Times. I definitely have to go exploring on this one.
UPDATE III. Turns out, the IB organization is part of UNESCO, that Jew-baiting, Israel-hating UN division operating out of France. So then the School Board is proposing that we turn the curriculum of our schools over to a Swiss division of a French arm of the United Nations. ARE YOU FRIGGIN’ KIDDING ME ???!!! Ooo, this is going to be fun.
House votes to kill the alternative F-35 engine. The Pentagon and both the Bush and Obama administrations have been trying for years to kill this, without success until today. A first victory for the Tea Party but a looong way to go.
Reader “Global Macro” wrote to inquire why brokers don’t deliberately under price their listings so that they can save on advertising, collect a quick commission and move on. I suppose the answer is that, much as they’d like to do exactly that, it’s almost impossible to obtain a listing at fair market, let alone below market price because homeowners always want more. And in this town, there are plenty of agents willing to tell homeowners what they want to hear.
It’s also because of the business model taught all agents. Representing a buyer can be a pain in the ass. You’re committing to show dozens of houses, over a period of up to a year or even two years, if the client hasn’t left you by then, all for a single commission. So agents are taught to grab as many listings as they can, slap on a price and a lockbox and let one of the thousand other agents in town sell the house for you. You get the same commission as the buyer’s agent and you’ve expended little energy.
In the glory days, this was a viable approach. Agents who amassed 100 + listings could, and did,earn over a $1 million a year. I don’t think it’s working so well these days.
Anyway, that’s my explanation. I enjoy working with buyers so I’m cool with the process, but I do see the attractiveness of going for listings.
From the OMB, an interesting chart showing how the Obummer budget will lift federal spending from an already astonishing $3 trillion + today to $6 trillion in 2021. Keynes said, “in the long run, we’re all dead”, and if planning on being dead in ten years and have no children or grandchildren to worry about, then sleep well tonight.
From the OMB
Florida’s new governor just killed the high-speed rail line between Tampa and Orlando after looking at the numbers and concluding it’s a sure money loser that will cost Florida real bucks. If a railroad between Tampa and Disney World can’t be profitable, how much do you suppose Connecticut’s railroad from nowhere to nowhere, or, New Haven to Springfield, will lose? Down in Florida, they’ve elected a man who worries about such things. We, on the other hand, have replaced one spendthrift with another. Oh joy.
When my children were very young, one of their favorite books was Would You Rather, a delightfully illustrated work that purported to offer the child a choice between, say, a delicious ice cream cone “or would you rather have a bowl of nice slug stew?” For a five-year-old and her parent reading it aloud , it was all great fun.
I was reminded of that book today when a friend and fellow realtor wrote in to caution me that I was killing all my chances of ever obtaining another listing in town because I keep giving objective opinions of price. Hmm, says I to myself, if I were a homeowner, trying to price my house for sale, would I rather an honest opinion from an agent, or some fluffy, totally unreal opinion concocted solely for the purpose of obtaining my listing? Personally, I’d prefer the ice cream cone, even if it weren’t quite as large a helping as I might prefer, but if an owner prefers a heaping bowl of slug stew, especially one topped with a scoop of artificial ice cream well, I guess that’s his business.I’ll survive, either way.