(Hat tip to the Old Mick)
Daily Archives: January 26, 2012
$118 million of your money down the rat hole as electric car battery supplier goes bust. Will Joe Biden, who went to the factory last year for a photo-op, return to attend the bankruptcy hearings?
We’re just minutes away from the closing bell and no real estate activity in the way of new sales has been reported. In fact, for all of this week there have been exactly three accepted offers: Hilton Heath (Cos Cob!), $1.698 ask; 5 Sicklebar (NOPO), $969,000; and 3 Ct. Ave (multi-family), $595,000. Last week was a bust too, if you’re counting.
Warren Buffet, Obummer’s richest friend and one of the richest in the world, pays his secretary just $60,000 per year. Holy crap, executive secretaries for high-end executives were pulling in more than $100,000 when I was in the business world twenty years ago. $60,000 a year and this man wants to take money from me? Charity begins at home, you old fraud. Oh, by the way: that 37% tax bracket of hers that Obummer and he are so worked up about? Totally bogus. What? Theatre and fraud? Who said that?
Or at least I thought so – certainly it was the stand-out in the otherwise-sparce open house list today. 16 Lake Drive South – purchased for $1.8 million in 2003, asking $2.1 now. The previous owners punched out the back and added a master bedroom/bath upstairs and a very nice kitchen below and, while these sellers may not have done anything since then, they’ve certainly maintained it and it looks great. A little choppy upstairs with a couple of three-step platforms to different rooms but perhaps that was the 1920’s version of a split level. Not objectionable, to me, just something to get used to.
Far more charm than anything built in the past fifty years and a good location. I think Shore & Country has priced it fairly and I’m sure other agents will think so too. In the $2 million market and looking in Riverside? So are a hundred other buyers and I bet this one goes quickly..
828 North Street (across from Conyers Farm) has cut its price from $4 million to $3.895. I’m pretty sure, and I’ve shown this house to prospective buyers, that a buyer in this range wouldn’t be put off by a mere $105,000 difference of opinion on its value: there are other factors (distance from town, in my own buyers’ case, perhaps others in other cases) that have prevented this house from selling>. However, the right price cures all so if I had a house that hadn’t sold in four years, like this one, I’d take a meat axe to the price.
Which the owner has done, but only via the death by a thousand cuts approach. In 2008, the price was $6, 495,000 – $3.895 is an improvement over that. But imagine if that cut had come in perhaps two big chunks rather than an endless series of nibbles. I’d guess that the house would have been sold by now and probably for a better price than it’s now asking.
All that said, this is a beautiful four-acre parcel and if you’re looking to build in the back country, I’d consider it.