Yes. Next question?

Moving Day: Highland clearances

Should mortgage rates vary by state according to risk? Fannie Mae is floating an idea (that will never go anywhere) that would see mortgage rates reflect the difficulty and length of time it takes to foreclose on a loan in each of the 57 states. Makes sense to me because interest rates are supposed to reflect risk, at least in part, and the risk of a lender recovering its money increases in states like Connecticut and New York that require a lengthy, drawn-out process to regain ownership of a home asset.

Here in Greenwich I’ve seen borrowers stretch out their tenancy for 3, 3 1/2 years, repeatedly filing frivolous defenses, switching lawyers (and thus delaying the foreclosure date) at the last minute, running into Bankruptcy Court time after time even though, each time, their case is thrown out, and so on. Stamford Superior Court judge Douglas Mintz, who is assigned to oversee our local foreclosure scheme, seems increasingly tolerant of these spurious tactics – the job must be getting to him, because he was an able jurist just a few years ago.

So if a lender faces a three-year delay in one state and a ninety-day wait in another, why shouldn’t it charge borrowers in the former more interest to compensate their loss?

3 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

3 responses to “Yes. Next question?

  1. Anonymous

    Agree. No different than how health insurance is calculated by state risk/population of it’s healthy v. non-healthy residents.

  2. Westchesterer

    No. Let the banks decide how much interest they should charge to be profitable. Fannie and Freddie are a disaster and a money laundering operation for the politicians and their crony friends. They’re the quintessential example of what happens when the government interferes with the free market. They backstop loans on the taxpayers dime and their friends cash in on the profits. Socialized risk, thugacised rewards.

    Do you not realize that the government is not only idiotically inefficient but also filthly corrupt? You can’t trust these thugs with anything. The more money you give the thugs(tax shakedowns or printing press) the more guns(laws) they pass to shoot you down.

  3. anonymous

    The other YES for today is watching a pow-wow: the Cherokee delegates in North Carolina want to have a meet-cute with Princess Warren.
    http://www.bostonherald.com/news/politics/view/20220904tribal_activist_shame_on_her_indian_delegates_seek_sit-down_with_liz/srvc=home&position=0