Daily Archives: December 19, 2012

So what’s an AR-15?

ar-15Lots of interesting information here for people who, like me, don’t know much or anything about the gun or why someone would want one. I’ve never lusted after an AR-15 purely for aesthetic reasons: I think they’re ugly, but learning of how versatile they are and especially watching the media swarm to ban them is making me rethink that position.  I may get one next year, while I still can.


Filed under Uncategorized

But, but ….


Hang on 200 years and this will all warm up

Hang on 200 years and this will all warm up, or so I’m told

Coldest winter in seventy years locks onto Russia.  Al Gore blames Bush.


Filed under Uncategorized

I have a client who’ll get a chuckle out of this


Inflated dreams come to earth, eventually

Inflated dreams come to earth, eventually

34 Bote Road reports a sale price of $1,667,575 million. Back when the owner thought it was worth, I kid you not, $2.795 million, my client offered to buy it at a number significantly lower than its ask but considerably more than this final price. We were told, “that’s why there are colored balloons – everyone has a different opinion”.

We dodged a bullet on this one, buddy.


Filed under Uncategorized

You can’t really say he’s hit a new low, but he sure’s still stuck about as low as a human being can be

Obama: “The children of Newtown died so that I could tax the rich”.


Filed under Uncategorized

How can we possibly solve this horrible dilemma with a house divided?

Joe Biden: “Barack O’Bama tries to fool with my Beretta, he’s got a problem.”


Filed under Uncategorized

Do I have this right?

So the court sets her up with a date, she stands the poor guy up and runs off with her son – is that what happened here?

Screen Shot 2012-12-19 at 3.05.39 PM

Comments Off on Do I have this right?

Filed under Uncategorized

I pointed this out just yesterday, but here are some numbers to back it up

Criminals are killing criminals with all those guns.

Screen Shot 2012-12-19 at 2.39.42 PMWASHINGTON — A spike in murders in many cities is claiming a startling number of victims with criminal records, police say, suggesting that drug and gang wars are behind the escalating violence.

In Baltimore, about 91% of murder victims this year had criminal records, up from 74% a decade ago, police reported.

Philadelphia police Capt. Ben Naish says the Baltimore numbers are “shocking.” Philadelphia also has seen the number of victims with criminal pasts inch up — to 75% this year from 71% in 2005.

In Milwaukee, local leaders created the homicide commission after a spike in violence led to a 39% increase in murders in 2005. The group compiled statistics on victims’ criminal histories for the first time and found that 77% of homicide victims in the past two years had an average of nearly 12 arrests.

In Newark, where three young friends with no apparent links to crime were executed Aug. 4, roughly 85% of victims killed in the first six months of this year had criminal records, on par with the percentage in 2005 but up from 81% last year, police statistics show.

David Kennedy, a professor at New York’s John Jay College of Criminal Justice, says the rise in criminals killing criminals has escaped policymakers’ attention.

“The notion that these (murders) are random bolts of lightning, which is the commonly held image, is not the reality,” says Kennedy, who has examined the backgrounds of murder suspects and victims in multiple U.S. cities. “It happens, but it doesn’t happen often.”

The slaying of truly innocent victims is so unusual in Baltimore that the chief prosecutor says the city has become dangerously numb to the carnage. “If we don’t put human faces on the victims, we will become desensitized,” State Attorney Patricia Jessamy says.

To late for this writer – these thugs’ mothers may miss them, but I won’t.


Filed under Uncategorized