Daily Archives: May 29, 2013
Greenwich Time reports that the school board is sticking with its decision to cut a day from winter break. From what I hear, the paper has fired still more of its few remaining reporters and moved to still smaller quarters. News will be pretty much reported from Hartford. It’s been suggested that an on line site offering real reportage would do well, and I’d consider doing that if
I weren’t so lazy had the time. Any reporters out there?
2 Horseshoe Road, Cos Cob, asking $1.385 million, has a buyer. I liked this house and thought it was a good value. Two different sets of clients looked at it, saw its value but declined to bid, but that was because its site didn’t serve their requirements. It sits up high on rocks and overlooks ponds on two sides. Parents with young children get nervous about rock “cliffs” these days; in my time, we’d see them as a great opportunity for climbing but never mind – times change. The house itself was gutted down to the studs not long ago and pretty much completely rebuilt. Here’s a case where price really wasn’t as relevant as waiting for the right buyer. Listing agent Tom Broadhurst did a good job pricing it to begin with (that just means I agreed with him, but heck …).
7 Loughlin Avenue, also in Cos Cob, is back after reporting an accepted offer a few weeks ago. The sellers made two mistakes, I think, when first listing it in January; one was pricing it at $1.750 million, the other was demanding that a pre-qualification letter from an approved lender be presented before the potential buyer could even enter to look at it. I don’t know whether they corrected that second error; I wouldn’t go near it, but I give them credit for recognizing that their price was too high and rapidly correcting it, taking large price cuts repeatedly until they hit $1.195 and finding, or so it seemed, a buyer.
I don’t know what went wrong here, and there are so many reasons a deal can fall through that it’s unfair to speculate, but the house is right on Loughlin Park and an easy walk to the train or what passes for the Cos Cob shopping district – seems like a decent value, today.
Aside from the BOE’s threatened destruction of Riverside property values, there’s no significant real estate activity reported today, so far, but I was intrigued by a message sent to my peers about the result of a raffle conducted at an “exclusive” broker open house yesterday up in Conyers Farm. The house is not listed on the MLS and is priced at $10 million – not a price that’s going to attract many buyers for a home so close to Banksville. Instead of slashing its price or – gasp!- placing it on the MLS, the owner and his broker tried luring agents up to an open house by offering prizes. I didn’t go, because I have no $10 million clients (though if you’d like to change that, feel free to call). Here’s what persuaded 60 real estate agents to drive 40 miles north – I won’t say they were bought cheaply, just that there must be some bored people out there looking for something to fill their day:
FREDERIC FEKKAI – CUT AND BLOW DRY
APPLE I PAD MINI
DINNER FOR 2 AT THE HOMESTEAD
SUBSCRIPTION TO 5 HEARST MAGAZINES [Second prize, 10 subscriptions and a recycling bin – Ed]
BOTTLE OF LA CREMA CHARDONNAY
BOTTLE OF PINOT NOIR
BOTTLE OF ROSE –
GOURMET GIFT BASKET
SILK COAT AND NECKLACE FROM “PINKY”
I’ve been receiving messages about the absolutely awful science curriculum that’s been introduced and imposed on our kids. If it’s as bad as these writers say (and several have expressed the hope that we could interest Brian Peldunas, the man who rid the curriculum of “Every Day Math”, in getting involved in all science education, instead of just math), it’d be a shame to let the issue get lost in the massive battle gearing up against busing.
Maybe after the busing meeting on D-Day.
Under the subject heading, “Misinformation on your blog”, I have just received the following email:
The information on your blog is incorrect.
You have picked up a sample redistricting map from a 2007 study, used as part of a Board report/discussion back in December referencing the last look at redistricting in the district. This was part of a larger discussion on options for addressing racial imbalance and enrollment issues. It is NOT a proposed redistricting plan.
The Board will be receiving information about possible options for addressing the facility utilization and racial imbalance issues facing the District at it’s June 6th meeting. These options, redistricting among them, will be discussed over the next several months and into the Fall before the Board adopts any plans.
I invite you to attend the Public Forum on this topic tomorrow night at Central Middle School at 7pm and/or as a Relator in Town, to the Realtors Meeting at Greenwich High School on Friday (the topic on Friday will be the high school, but we will touch on the District enrollment issues as well and have offered the GAR to hold a another meeting dedicated to the topic).
Additionally, you can obtain updated, accurate information on the GPS web site, here:http://www.greenwichschools.org/page.cfm?p=10833
We appreciate any efforts you can give at clarifying this for the community on your blog.
Director of Communications
Greenwich Public Schools
290 Greenwich Avenue
Greenwich, CT, 06830
Why am I not impressed? Because Ms. Eve’s own communication is itself misleading or at best, incomplete. Here are my questions:
Explain why the document containing the 2007 busing map is dated January 28, 2013. I didn’t “pick it up”, you included it in an official release from the BOE announcing a public hearing on “redistricting”, this week.
Explain these illustrations from that January 28, 2013 BOE document:
What does “Full or partial redistricting” mean?
What’s involved in “Improving racial balance”?
Do you see busing included in “unacceptable means” of achieving racial balance? Neither do I.
Why on earth has Greenwich ceded half the governing power of this town to Democrats and Republicans, who represent a quarter and a third of registered voters, respectively, when the majority are unaffiliated? The set up now is that the Board of Estimate and Taxation (all spending) and the Board of Education are composed solely of equal numbers of Democrats and Republicans, with no representation of unaffiliated citizens. This is not strictly true, always: the two parties nominate exactly the number of candidates allocated their side and count on voter ignorance and apathy to ensure their election. An independent party could be established and run its own slate of candidates and who knows? Given enough publicity and a hot issue, those people might win.
If ever there was a chance for that happening, our current spate of bad budgeting and now, busing, ought to serve as the necessary catalyst.
Two commenters have supplied notice of a school board busing public forum tomorrow night Central Middle School. Here:
FYI – on the website- the public forum is:
Public Forum: Facilty Utilization & Racial Balance
Central Middle School
Not sure why it is not mentioned in above notice.
Everyone should go tomorrow!
Two friends (Fly Angler, Pal Nancy, thank you), have sent along this NYT review of J-House. The critic is, er, critical.
The review apparently missed the bar scene, which includes amorous couples fornicating in every semi-secluded spot in the neighborhood, from the ATM kiosk across the street to the driveways of private homes and even the parking lot of a tire store (WTF?). The roar of I-95, literally 25′ away, gets only passing mention, but I’m delighted to see that she draws our attention to the heated toilet seats. Like her, the immediate image to comes to mind is that of a pair of fat buttocks vacating the room just before the next occupant. Ugh.
In keeping with the hotel’s penchant for gadgets, the toilet-bidet combo had more buttons and functions than a clock radio. A heated seat gave the unnerving impression it had recently been occupied, while the motion-sensing lid had a life of its own, automatically opening when someone walked by. Oddly, the most basic necessity, toilet paper, was absent when we checked in, requiring a request to the front desk. On the plus side, there were L’Occitane products and attractive Kohler fixtures.
The hotel’s stylish restaurant, Eleven14 Kitchen, serves New American food often accompanied by the now-familiar buzz words like “gluten-free” and “organic,” and high prices (the most affordable breakfast option: a bagel with herb cream cheese at $9). The dinner menu includes pastas, salads and surf-and-turf entrees like organic salmon and rainbow chard ($24) and an excellent burger with Amish Cheddar ($22). Service was problematic: one server couldn’t answer basic questions about the wine list (dry or sweet); water arrived in badly cracked glasses. Room service, which will deliver poolside, is available only from 7 a.m. to 10:30 p.m.
Despite J House’s sometimes baffling idiosyncrasies and hit-or-miss service, its relatively reasonable rates make it a good option for business travelers who prefer their hotels with a bit of personality.
The (completely erroneous) interpretation of the Supreme Court decision in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, 551 U.S. 701 (2007), barring school redistricting on account of race, an interpretation being used by our school board to justify its plans to bus children around town, was provided by local resident Dick Blumenthal while he was Democrat Attorney General. You’ll hardly be surprised that Mr. Blumenthal sends his own children to private school: in fact, one of his daughters was this year’s valedictorian at Greenwich Academy. That’s a credit to her, although it is not unfair to speculate how she’d have performed at Hamilton Avenue, but certainly not any tribute to her duplicitous, hypocritical father.
Blumenthal is a man who lied about serving in Viet Nam, and even about such a trivial thing as being a member of the Harvard varsity swim team. We should destroy entire neighborhoods based on what he says is the true holding of the Parents Involved case? Better that our board sends him a speedo and a Viet Nam Veterans cap, thanks him for his advice, and forgets that he ever intruded on this matter.
Many of these people are quitting, doubtless because they fear facing the consequences of their Music Hall fiasco and their upcoming decision to screw Riverside (and don’t believe for a second that your own neighborhood is exempt from this social engineering: when busing Riverside children to Byram fails to raise the educational performance of their new peers, the levelers’ efforts will metastasize into yours). But for now, here’s the Town of Greenwich’s list.
In June 2012, the Greenwich Public Schools were cited by the CT State Board of Education for Racial Imbalance in two schools – Hamilton Avenue School (HAS) and New Lebanon School (NLS). As defined by State Statute (10-226e), schools are cited for racial imbalance when the percentage of the minority population in a given school is 25% points more or less than the average for the comparable schools in the District.
In January 2013, the Board of Education directed the Superintendent to develop a plan to address facility utilization and racial balance issues in the District.Over the last few months an extensive enrollment and demographic data analysis has been conducted. The Board of Education and the Greenwich community will be presented with the historical background, existing conditions and a definition of the problem at the May 23, 2013 Board of Education (BOE) meeting. A second presentation at the BOE June 6, 2013 meeting will explore possible options for addressing the facility utilization and racial balance issues that exist today and are projected for the future. The Greenwich community is encouraged to provide feedback through various (OPORTUNIDADES PARA COMENTARIO PÚBLICO)
Le recomendamos que envíe comentarios y sugerencias con respecto a la utilización de las instalaciones y las cuestiones sobre el equilibrio racial que enfrentan las Escuelas Públicas de Greenwich. Puede hacerlo en persona en cualquiera de los foros públicos o audiencias o enviar sus comentarios utilizando esta oportunidad de Comentarios Públicos en línea.