Anyone missing a crazy uncle? For that matter, is Walt still out of town?

From a FWIW reader:

Hi Christopher
So on Friday I was at the Greenwich Beach and my friend’s kids come running over saying there was a naked man over by the rocks at the point all the way at the end of the beach (where my kids and lots of kids look for crabs etc) Long story short called 911, GPD came, the dude was pleasuring himself, naked and had a bag filled with dildos etc all sexual predator perv stuff. All I know is he was cuffed, the kids had to give a statement so did their mom as guardian and they took him away. They did say he was not a Greenwich resident. I’m telling you this because I can’t understand why it’s not in the paper. All parents need to be aware that the beach is not perfectly safe and their kids can just run free, we still have to keep an eye out no matter where we are. Let me know if you have any questions about this. so creepy.


Filed under Uncategorized

30 responses to “Anyone missing a crazy uncle? For that matter, is Walt still out of town?

  1. Cobra

    How did Dollar Bill get a beach pass?

  2. Walt

    Dude –
    Somehow. SOMEWHERE!! I feel that I should be offended by your childlike comments. By your illiterate, inane prose. But yet I am not!!

    Is it because of your lack of writing skills? Possibly. Or your inane scribble? More likely. Or the density of my puny little brain? We may never know!! ISN’T LIFE WONDERFUL!! Did you miss me, you big galoot? No homo stuff here Dude. Keep it clean.

    So I ask you. I ASK YOU!! Who goes to the beach with a half a bag of dildos? Why not a full bag? I CALL BS ON THIS STORY!! Tod’s Point is not a bad place to choke your chicken. To flap your flounder. To rub the lizard. But when kids are around? That is just wrong.

    Your Pal,

  3. To my experience, there does seem to be a correlation between nakedness and crabs.

  4. Anonymous

    Its true I was there and police everywhere and then a homeless looking guy in a back of a cruiser. people who walked by the scene said they saw tons of dildos in his bag. he was naked and some kids saw him and told the life guards.

  5. LAK

    Glad I missed that!
    I was wondering why a cop was there today walking on the beach.

  6. greenwich dude

    the beach is not “perfectly safe” even without dildo bearing homeless guys having a crank. possibly not in the news because not so newsworthy – in San Francisco they call this kind of stuff “Tuesday morning”

  7. Riverslide

    Very strange that it was not in the newspaper, yet the newspaper publishes all sorts of details about people who allegedly drink too much or get in family squabbles.

    Also, the paper should’ve confirmed how a non-resident got in. Did he buy a pass at the civic center, or did our staffers at the gate miss him (even though they are plenty strict with the rest of us)?

  8. Anonymous Citizenette

    Maybe someone with influential family or friends who is trying to keep it quiet? Wouldn’t that be great.

    • Cos Cobber

      Ha, good point, that is highly likely…especially around here.

      As for in town or out of town, what difference does it make? There is no going back – the park must be shared. Now we just need to be sure we enforce the entry fees and so far, from what I see, they do a good job with that.

      • Riverside Chick

        Too bad someone didn’t shoot him in the face.

        • Take some responsibility – he’s YOUR boyfriend, YOU shoot him.

        • Fred2

          Shooting seems a little harsh for a pervert, seeing as he wasn’t actually harming anyone at the time.

          And seriously, of all the places. He WANTED to be caught/seen.

        • Riverside Chick

          Sorry Mark, I’m just not compassionate to pervert/pedophile/sexual assault individuals. I don’t want my tax money going to “rehabilitate”him which has been proven not to work. He’ll be out on the streets next week at another beach or park near children doing the same thing. I wouldn’t have a problem if he was just desposed of.

        • Anonymous

          I totally agree with Riverside Chick. Zero Tolerance on naked guys with dildos mid day at the Beach…any beach!!

  9. Anonymous

    Fred2- I think “shooting him in the face” has a hidden meaning behind it.

    • Fred2

      The comment just said shooting. Nothing about the face.

      I still think shooting is too strong an action for someone who is not actively engaged,(or threatening imminent harm) in harming someone else, not matter how dubious they are otherwise acting.

      While this doesn’t appear to necessarily be the case here, a certain fraction of people do lose their minds for whatever reason ( drugs, dementia, psychological disturbance) and act very oddly. I’d prefer that neither citizens, nor the cops go about shooting them for reasons that are not “self defense or self defense by proxy.”

      (Sorry, I’m not keen on pervy sexual predators either, but I also know an old guy who lost it one afternoon and started walking down the street starkers… after some medical treatment he regained his senses, was fine, and acutely embarrassed. He’s a fine old gentleman with a new health problem, not a sicko.)

  10. it’s very possibly a case of Prestadidwicks Congena
    (the video is hilarious (particularly the British idiomatic wordplay), but, i… just… can’t… link it).

  11. Anonymous

    Kind of gives a whole new meaning to the word panhandling…

  12. Anonymous

    Rumor has it that the man was attorney Brendan Leydon of Stamford…