That’s because he’s not British, he’s Muslim


"British" Muslims in London

“British” Muslims in London

James Foley’s beheader identified as Muslim from England.

The masked jihadist known as “John the Beatle” has been identified by British security services, sources said Saturday.

MI5 and MI6 have identified the British fighter suspected of murdering the American journalist James Foley, senior government sources confirmed last night.

The masked man with a London accent, who is said to be known to fellow fighters as “Jihadi John”, was seen in the shocking video of Foley’s death released by the Isis extremist army last week.

While sources gave no details of the man they have identified, a key suspect is Abdel-Majed Abdel Bary, 23, who left his family’s £1m home in Maida Vale, west London, last year. He recently tweeted a picture of himself holding up a severed head.

“It is horrifying to think that the perpetrator of this heinous act could have been brought up in Britain,” British Foreign Secretary Phillip Hammond wrote in the Sunday Times.

In addition, Hammond referred to the actions of “John the Beatle” as “an utter betrayal” of everything the British stand for, The Sunday Times reported.

Horrifying, maybe, but not surprising. Islam recognizes no secular state, so a Muslim bred and raised in such a state owes no allegiance to it and will not consider his actions to be a “betrayal”.

They’re swarming in Austria, Sweden, Denmark and the Netherlands, and every other European country – just do as I just did to find links to these four countries: Google “Muslim violence (name that country)” and you’ll have a inexhaustible supply of news, stretching back decades. So who doesn’t get this? Our Secretary of State, for one, who just last week, speaking to the Foley execution, said: 

 ISIL is the face of that evil, a threat to people who want to live in peace, and an ugly insult to the peaceful religion they violate every day with their barbarity.

ISIL is the face of Islam, you silly twit, and as such, is the logical ending for the Islamic goal of world domination.


Filed under Uncategorized

14 responses to “That’s because he’s not British, he’s Muslim

  1. Anonymous

    I am no expert on Islam, and have wondered, as apparently you do, how it can be considered a religion in light of all we read and hear: persecution of “non-believers”, barbaric punishments, treatment of women, etc. I have seen recent commentaries on a specific subgroup of Muslims, Sunni Salafis, and wonder if it could be true that it is this particular group that gives the rest the religion the reputation that we hold of Islam:

    Unfortunately, there seems to be either a deafening silence from the rest of the Muslim world or worse, vocal support, when the various atrocities that disgust us take place. If it is true that there is only small minority of Muslims responsible for the campaign against the civilized world, we need to hear the outrage from within the Muslim community.

  2. time for the crusades.
    what these muslims don’t like to admit is that many century’s before that pig Mahammed was born these were all Christian Lands, including Mecca!
    Now I know that the West created Al Qaeda and that the USA trained ISIS in Qatar, but had Islam not been a religious cult of evil we never would have had that power over these animals.
    Israel has it right, get rid of them all, like rabid dogs they will never learn to live in peace, END OF STORY!

  3. louis van leeuwen

    Do Kerry and Chamberlin have anything in common?

  4. AJ

    On September 11, 1683 the invasion of Europe by a 300,000 man Muslim army was brought to a complete halt and totally destroyed by one Christian monk and a small Polish cavalry. Some scenes from the movie “The Day of the Siege”, cool, and you can watch it on Netflix.

  5. Cue up the montage of Kerry and a box of rocks. The rocks might be sharper.

  6. here’s hoping that they’re still not on our payroll, like these folks in Afghanistan:

  7. Anonymous

    I’m really beginning to realize just what a bunch of cowards Muslims in the Middle East are. They target women to beat and kill, but when there’s opposition like Isis, they scream for the US to come and save them. Why can’t they fight their own battles? Most of them are armed better than we are (RPGs and AKs). I guess the problem lies in the fact that the enemy will actually shoot back (flashback to Saddam’s elite guard high-tailing it out of there after the air strikes started). Come to think of it, blowing up unarmed women and children on planes and in the market place doesn’t take bravery either. Neither does killing a bound, unarmed journalist.They demand the US come bail them out, but why didn’t they do anything to stop these groups in their own country? Why won’t other Muslims come to their aid, there’s certainly no shortage of them in the Middle East. Then, when the US does their dirty work for them, they bravely congregate with signs denouncing the US and demanding our expulsion. Even their style of “warfare” (if you can call it that) is to fire rockets or bullets and then run as fast as they can into the nearest hole. The US can try to put a dent in Isis, but another group will just be allowed to spring up in its place. So much for Muslims not killing Muslims and being a religion of “peace”. Just bad propaganda.

  8. Anonymous

    If the UK were an American state it would be poorer than all the American states except Mississippi.

    Uncontrolled immigration has ruined England.

  9. AJ Nock

    What do we want? DEPORTATION! When do we want it? NOW! Otherwise there will eventually be no “Europe” and..some time “United States”..merely one giant “Caliphate”