Funny, this commentator’s summary was exactly my conclusion too

13375329-Naked-girl-on-a-glacier-Stock-Photo-nude-women-woman

Frigid feminist

Glaciers, gender, and science: A feminist glaciology framework for global environmental change research

Abstract

Glaciers are key icons of climate change and global environmental change. However, the relationships among gender, science, and glaciers – particularly related to epistemological questions about the production of glaciological knowledge – remain understudied. This paper thus proposes a feminist glaciology framework with four key components: 1) knowledge producers; (2) gendered science and knowledge; (3) systems of scientific domination; and (4) alternative representations of glaciers. Merging feminist postcolonial science studies and feminist political ecology, the feminist glaciology framework generates robust analysis of gender, power, and epistemologies in dynamic social-ecological systems, thereby leading to more just and equitable science and human-ice interactions.

Yes, I too was sure this was a parody, but in fact the lead author is the associate dean at the University of Oregon. Do they really sit around and say, “Gee—the gender of that glacier is uncertain to me. It might be a trans-glacier, perhaps reversing course in the next cycle. I’ll have to cross-reference it with my post-colonial epistemology thesaurus.”

Well why not? I notice the recent Paris Agreement on climate change has, among other nonsense, this paragraph:

Acknowledging that climate change is a common concern of humankind, Parties should, when taking action to address climate change, respect, promote and consider their respective obligations on human rights, the right to health, the rights of indigenous peoples, local communities, migrants, children, persons with disabilities and people in vulnerable situations and the right to development, as well as gender equality, empowerment of women and intergenerational equity. . .

This is why you get Trump.

 

7 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

7 responses to “Funny, this commentator’s summary was exactly my conclusion too

  1. AJ

    This is why you get Trump? This is why you need Trump!

  2. Yos

    This is why you *ironically* get Trump. He’s not a lot more clear about anything, that one can tell.

  3. Not really on topic: The Leonardo DiCaprio family saga continues:

    http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-35746586